{"id":3892,"date":"2012-07-08T07:00:46","date_gmt":"2012-07-08T12:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.progressivefox.com\/?p=3892"},"modified":"2018-08-16T15:50:58","modified_gmt":"2018-08-16T20:50:58","slug":"jesus-meets-the-republican-party","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.progressivefox.com\/?p=3892","title":{"rendered":"Jesus Meets the Republican Party"},"content":{"rendered":"

It was early in the morning and I was late for an appointment. But it was my brother calling, so I answered my cell.<\/p>\n

\u201cHey Ellen,\u201d he said, \u201cYou know that piece you wrote about Hultgren being unconcerned about all those people who don\u2019t have medical insurance<\/a>?\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWell, yeah,\u201d I said. \u201cThe one where the man asked Hultgren why he opted to take federal health insurance for himself and his family, but didn\u2019t want the rest of us to have it<\/a>?\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cYeah, that one,\u201d he responded. \u201cI sent that piece to my neighbor who voted for Hultgren because he is a Christian. I thought she would see this as the betrayal of Christian morals it actually is.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cBut she didn\u2019t see it that way, Ellen. I don\u2019t get it,\u201d he continued. \u201cDidn\u2019t we learn the Golden Rule? You know, do onto others as you would have them do onto you?\u201d <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u201cOr how about this one\u2014-\u2018whatever you do to the least among you, you do also to me\u2019? What about that?\u201d he asked, really puzzled this time. <\/p>\n

Jimmy (I can\u2019t help calling him that–he is my younger brother after all) comes to me with some of the most beautiful and heartfelt questions. <\/p>\n

It\u2019s a tough question, isn\u2019t it? How can we see innocent people dying from lack of medical care and deny them insurance coverage? Mothers. Fathers. Children. Do we pretend they don\u2019t exist? Or perhaps look the other way? Do we find another way to explain it so we don\u2019t have to put ourselves out there to remedy the situation? Do we look for another way, perhaps, to justify our own lack of compassion? Certainly the popular mantra, \u201cWhat would Jesus do?\u201d presents a conflict.<\/p>\n

Jimmy went on to say his neighbor couldn\u2019t answer him about why she believes it is okay for Hultgren, within his stated Christian religious belief system, to deny innocents medical insurance coverage. She clearly had no conflict with the lack of coverage for these people, and with Hultgren\u2019s apparent lack of concern. <\/p>\n

I was so troubled by Jimmy\u2019s questions that I contacted Janice, an old college friend who had become a psychotherapist. I told her some of the following facts about Obamacare. (ObamaCareFacts.com<\/a>)<\/p>\n

  • All insurance companies must provide medical insurance comparable to Obamacare insurance. This means that tactics insurance companies have used in the past to reduce or eliminate insurance benefits for expensive, sick people will no longer be legal. <\/li>\n
  • All preventative care is free on all insurance plans\u2014-this means no co-pays and no deductibles. <\/li>\n
  • No one can be dropped due to illness and no one can be denied coverage due to preexisting conditions. No one\u2019s coverage can be limited over his lifetime. Children can stay on their parent\u2019s policy until they reach age 26.<\/li>\n
  • Medicaid will be reformed and expanded to cover more people\u2014-an estimated 32 million more people will have insurance that are currently without coverage. That means people without jobs will be covered. <\/li>\n
  • Employers will get tax credits to help offset their insurance expense for employees.<\/li>\n

    Then I gave her the financial information about how the program will be funded. (About.com by Kimberly Amadeo\u2014Congressional Budget Office Report<\/a> and Obamacare Summary<\/a>)<\/p>\n

  • The Congressional Budget Office estimates that over ten years, the deficit will be reduced by $143 billion. That\u2019s billion.\n<\/li>\n
  • Drug companies will be charged more to help cover the \u201cdoughnut hole\u201d in Medicare Prescription Drug Part D Benefits. (Oh my, how do you think those big drug companies feel about this one?)<\/li>\n
  • Medicare reimbursements to hospitals will be reduced by 21% due to hospitals\u2019 increased reimbursements coming from patients who will have medical insurance. <\/li>\n
  • By 2018, \u201cCadillac\u201d insurance plans will pay a small tax on plans worth over $27,500 for families.<\/li>\n
  • Starting in 2013, taxes will be raised for high-income individuals making more than $200,000 and for families making more than $250,000 yearly. This is up from the current 1.45% tax to 2.35%-3.8%, depending upon the tax category. <\/li>\n
  • By 2014, members of Congress will be mandated to get their health insurance from the same sources as their constituents rather then from the government-provided insurance they receive now. (Wow, does that mean we will finally have equal insurance coverage?)<\/li>\n
  • Obamacare requires insurance companies spend at least 80% of premium payments on medical services\u2014rather than for CEO salaries, bonuses, and advertising. If they spend less than that 80% on medical services, that money must be refunded to their customers. (I could hardly believe this one when I read it. Insurance company CEOs having their right to rob from customers, give themselves big bonuses, being limited?!) <\/li>\n

    \u201cHow anyone of reasonable heart and mind can be against covering innocents for medical problems is a puzzle,\u201d I told Janice. \u201cEspecially when it makes such financial sense.\u201d<\/p>\n

    \u201cWell,\u201d Janice began, \u201cThat\u2019s just the issue. On some level, they tell themselves these unfortunate people are not innocent, that they have in some way created their lack of medical coverage and their own medical misfortunes.\u201d<\/p>\n

    \u201cIt\u2019s a clear \u2018blame the victim\u2019 mentality,\u201d she went on. \u201cThis is a defense against fear. It helps to remove them from their own fear of identifying with another\u2019s misfortunes. You know,\u201d she said, \u201cthe old–\u2018it can\u2019t happen to me, I\u2019m better than that\u2019?\u201d <\/p>\n

    \u201cOkay,\u201d I said. \u201cSo does that mean we have to let them off the hook because they are so fearful they can\u2019t see truth in the midst of their blame?\u201d <\/p>\n

    \u201cOh no,\u201d she very quickly replied, clearly having already anticipated my question. \u201cIt\u2019s not about \u2018can\u2019t\u2019 see the truth, it\u2019s about \u2018won\u2019t\u2019 see the truth. It ends up being a denial of one\u2019s personal responsibility to one\u2019s self. It truly is about an unwillingness to have the courage to challenge inconsistencies in one\u2019s beliefs. It\u2019s about unwillingness to confront one\u2019s own inner demons.\u201d <\/p>\n

    \u201cYou cannot hold the two beliefs together\u2014one of knowing that millions of people are literally dying from lack of medical coverage along with the Christian belief of Jesus\u2019s commandment to love thy neighbor as thyself,\u201d she said, really going into teaching mode now. \u201cThey are incompatible.\u201d<\/p>\n

    \u201cSo what should people do?\u201d I asked, thinking we have no solution.<\/p>\n

    \u201cThey need to have the courage to look at facts, rather than the spin of their political party or the spin of selfish and fearful beliefs that separate them from compassion for their fellow man,\u201d she said. \u201cAnd that can be hard. It\u2019s really a hero\u2019s journey. It\u2019s a big task to confront your own inner demons.\u201d <\/p>\n

    \u201cAnd what about Hultgren? Where does he fit with this fear\/courage blame the victim dynamic?\u201d<\/p>\n

    \u201cWell, he\u2019s much easier, I think,\u201d she responded after a long pause. \u201cHe\u2019s a politician and calls himself, I hear, a Christian. But I don\u2019t know what\u2019s in his heart. However, we do have his voting record, his statements, and his funding records. Don\u2019t we?\u201d<\/p>\n

    Between July 2009 and June 2011, Hultgren took $227,600 from the financial\/insurance industry. Given the restrictions Obamacare places upon the insurance industry, I am sure the industry would like to eliminate the plan. Hultgren is doing all he can to accomplish that, despite the very real needs of human beings in his district.<\/p>\n

    Hultgren tried to frighten us by telling us that we surely didn\u2019t want to have government \u2018bureaucratic\u2019 health insurance. Hear fear-mongering here? It\u2019s good enough for him, but not for us. Shame on him.<\/p>\n

    Then he tried to tell us that those who don\u2019t have insurance probably don\u2019t have jobs. Hear a \u2018blaming the victim\u2019 here? Shame on him.<\/p>\n

    He looks to be using the very effective tactic of political spin and fostering people\u2019s fears in order to stay in the good graces of his insurance company contributors. Shame, not courage, here. <\/p>\n

    The problem is even bigger than Hultgren, however. He isn\u2019t the only one in our political system who uses fear and blaming the victim to foster agendas favorable to large donors and corporations. But with the Republican Party it\u2019s endemic. It\u2019s been a David and Goliath battle\u2014with the innocents needing insurance being David and the insurance industry and Republican Party being Goliath.<\/p>\n

    Hultren embodies the traditional Republican mantra right now. The entire Republican Party is showing a cowardice and hatred unseen in the history of this country. Pandering to peoples\u2019 fears for political gain. Shame on them all. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    It was early in the morning and I was late for an appointment. But it was my brother calling, so I answered my cell. \u201cHey Ellen,\u201d he said, \u201cYou know that piece you wrote about Hultgren being unconcerned about all those people who don\u2019t have medical insurance?\u201d \u201cWell, yeah,\u201d I said. \u201cThe one where the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1025,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[78],"tags":[577,1185,1192,20,9,330,960,316,1209,1208,398],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.progressivefox.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3892"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.progressivefox.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.progressivefox.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.progressivefox.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1025"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.progressivefox.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3892"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"http:\/\/www.progressivefox.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3892\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7104,"href":"http:\/\/www.progressivefox.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3892\/revisions\/7104"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.progressivefox.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.progressivefox.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.progressivefox.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}